The difference between glass and wine

I love to se the impact Facebook is having in favoring people who want to achieve freedom for their countries. I recently read this post by Chris Taylor on Mashable, in which he highlights the links between what recently happened in Tunisia, Egypt and Lybia and the power of the world's biggest social network. Facebook helped people gather and organize revolts. What I really like is the importance Chris gives to people in those revolutions.



Facebook has been an outstanding tool: without it, it would have been impossible to organize as efficently or as fast. But still people would have organized sooner or later, as history tells us.

What's so amazing in social media? It's what Josh Bernoff and Charlene Li call "Groundswell": a social phenomenon that shifts the way the world works. The Groundswell changes the way ideas are born and spread. It lets people gather, facilitating exchange and cooperation. Needless to say how well this applies to a revolutionary context. The concpet of Groundswell is usually applied to companies and business, but in fact it's about our lives.

But watch out: don't confuse the glass with the wine. It's not about Facebook or Twitter helping people. It's all about a cultural shift that - mainly through social media - is changing the balance of power and the ability to communicate and to co-create our future.

Facebook is a huge tool, a wonderful cultural enabler.

Photo source: Mashable.com

When you're talking to everybody

...you're talking to nobody.


The aim of advertising is creating messages that must appeal the largest possible number of people. Considering people have different tastes, beliefs, values and objectives, the only way to do it is being mediocre. Mediocre equals uninteresting. You're going to be ignored. As Seth Godin would say "provide average message to average people".

Do you really want to talk to many? Build a conversation with niches. Start with two of them. Not enough? Find more, but don't forget to be relevant for each one.

Quantity doesn't work as well today as it did in the past: it can help you push on the accelerator and reach a wider audience, but chances it helps making an impact get smaller everyday.

How can you define a niche?
  1. Listen: use social media to gather input about it. What do people like, how do they behave and who is influential for them?
  2. Give: add value to the life of people who are in the niche. People don't think about your brand, they have needs, passions and desires your brand can meet;
  3. Embrace: follow the niche, don't expect the opposite. People will give you priceless guidance in finding people with similar interests;
What's your experience in finding and relating with niches? Has it been effective for you?

Brands: if you love your community, set it free

A long time ago Kahlil Gibran, a Lebanese American artist, poet, and writer said "If you love somebody, let them go, for if they return, they were always yours. And if they don't, they never were". A few years later, Gordon Matthew Thomas Sumner, who you know as Sting, rephrased it into "If You Love Somebody Set Them Free".

I'm not sure how much they were thinking about marketing when they first said it, but it really looks like their thinking is very strong applied to the relationship between people and brands.

A recent study by ExactTarget explains how brands that want to build a good, healthy and valuable relationship with their communities should avoid a few errors. Every one of this errors means being too much invasive in people's lives, and trying to be aggressively tied to them. This can often cause the opposite effect: if brands try to engage with too many messages too often, people will run away.

Sting and Gibran perhaps didn't have these data available when they wrote their formulas, but look at the evidence:

  • 44% say they "unlike" brands when they post too frequently;
  • 43% say they run away if their wall is too crowded with marketing posts;
  • 41% say they "unfollow" their brands if their streams becomes too crowded with marketing content;
  • 39% say they stop following a brand if the company posts too frequently;
So, if you're on brand side and responsible for a relationship with consumers through social media, look very carefully at your editorial plan and be sure you're not being too invasive in people's lives.






Otherwise, the consequence can be very hard:
  • Being ignored (19%);
  • Being unliked (43%);


I invite you to take a look at ExactTarget study, which is very interesting. What do you think about this? Are best brands setting people free enough?


Social Television: a new way to enjoy old media

The way we enjoy content has been heavily modified by social media. We feel like conversation must be a part of what we watch, we know that sharing should be integrated with what we read and we want a collective exchange with our social graph when we look for inspiration.

Think about it: this is the basis for all of the last evolutions in content fruition: the possibility to share the experience is the core of geolocation services, the possibility to live the same experience or to rate it as fundamental in tools like GetGlue or Miso. All of this is the foundation of what I called the "universal check-in".

Beyond “venues”: the universal check-in

The way people watch TV is chenging deeply: 42% surf the internet while watching television.

This has a big impact on the entertainment industry, too. New experiments are born everyday and I think we'll see many more in the next few months. One of the latest ones is very interesting, consisting in an app released by ABC for its TV Series Grey's Anatomy.

Here's how this iPad app works:

  • You watch your TV show
  • The app synchronizes with it, understanding via iPad's Mic the current timing of the show
  • The app lets you interact with the show and experience collateral content
Think about how powerful this solution can be applied to any content: it can connect you with your friends and generate a unique and social viewing experience.

Now it's just a little more than an experiment, and it can be improved a lot on the "social" side, but it can really be meaningful in the future of television and of content fruition devices, like iPads.






What do you think about it? Have you enjoyed similar viewing experiences?

Updates from Facebook

Twitter Updates

My Blog List

  • What happens if, instead of one sales call a day, you make ten? Or if instead of 3 freelancers working on scaling your work, you have thirty? What happens if...
    15 hours ago
  • Eccoci giunti al tanto atteso week-end e come ben sapete, non è week-end se non c’è il nostro Thank God We Are Social! Partiamo dunque con la prima chicca ...
    16 hours ago
  • I’ve always tried to be brutally honest with y’all when it come to money in this space because: 1 – It helps you trust the content I create here 2 – Being ...
    2 days ago
  • I am always going to love an Elvis quote. We don’t see enough of it in the world of business. And we should. After all, he was “The King”. So this qui...
    2 days ago
  • As we published last month, people are in the midst of making a Mobile Mind Shift: The expectation that any desired information or service is available, on a...
    4 days ago
  • I recently finished reading Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg's book Lean In. I've also researched and read many of the criticisms of the book. Some criticism is ...
    5 days ago
  • I have been on a bit of a tear on this blog as of late on the topic of authenticity and ethics in social media. While this is a vital issue, I had intended...
    5 days ago
  • In the beginning, there were products and services, and some were good. Fewer became trusted brands, but those that did enjoyed unquestioned loyalty supporte...
    6 days ago
  • There is a rather disturbing meme doing the rounds, which concerns the value (or not) of "big data". Its impact has been likened to the renaissance, the enli...
    2 months ago